Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations Case Solution

Posted by Sabrina Warren on May-02-2023

1. Introduction

This case study presents a detailed strategic analysis of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations. The case analysis covers key managerial and strategic issues that Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations is currently facing due to challenging internal and external environments. The case solution first conducts the strategic analysis by applying the relevant strategic management tools and frameworks, and then presents strategic recommendations based on overall analysis (Hamilton and Webster, 2018).

The case offers a holistic view of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations business environment. Case findings are relevant for all key stakeholders of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations. Reader should first read the case on Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations, and then read the analysis.

2. External environmental analysis of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

The external business environment comprises political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental factors that influence the strategic positioning of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations (Khalid and Rahman, 2019).

Here are key external environment characteristics:

External environmental forces are dynamic and uncontrollable

External environment can directly influence the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations strategic positioning

External environment requires continuous monitoring to timely identify the potential threats and opportunities (Shtal et al. 2018).

2.1. PESTLE analysis of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

2.1.1. Political

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations must carefully examine the potential impact of global political unrest on its business operations

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should actively monitor, and respond to the changes to legislation

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should analyze how taxation policies can influence its profitability in different countries where the company is currently present (Khalid and Rahman, 2019).

2.1.2. Economic

Rising GDP and growing consumer spending can help Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations in business expansion

Increasing interest rates can increase the debt cost for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations.

Reducing inflation can decrease the production cost of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations and increase profitability by driving up the sales revenue (Begley et al. 2005).

2.1.3. Social

The aging population can affect the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations brand positioning, as Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations currently targets young people.

Growing preferences for luxury items, and improving lifestyles can create more demand for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations premium-priced products (Perera, 2017).

2.1.4. Technological

Government is granting more technology incentives to fuel the innovation. It can help Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations achieve its innovation objectives.

Emerging automation trends require Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to revisit its business model, and enhance process efficiency.

Improving technological infrastructure can enable Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to resolve its supply chain inefficiencies (Shtal et al. 2018).

2.1.5. Environmental

The stringent environmental regulations require Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to ensure strict compliance with environmental standards.

Consumers’ growing environmental consciousness provides an opportunity to Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to launch more green, environment-friendly products.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should incorporate environmental thinking in its strategic decision-making process to position itself as a socially responsible organization (Moser, 2015).

2.1.6. Legal

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should take strict measures to avoid discrimination at the workplace.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations must abide by the consumer data privacy laws to avoid reputation-damaging lawsuits

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations must also ensure strict implementation of workplace safety standards to comply with the health and safety regulations (Khalid and Rahman, 2019).

2.2. Porter five forces of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

2.2.1. Bargaining power of suppliers

The growing number of suppliers is weakening their bargaining power against Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations (Dobbs, 2014).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has a wide supplier network, which strengthens its negotiation ability.

Low product differentiation further reduces the supplier bargaining power, as Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can easily switch to suppliers that offer better terms and conditions (Dobbs, 2014).

Overall, the bargaining power of suppliers for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations is low.

2.2.2. Bargaining power of buyers

There are a small number of buyers that buy in large quantities. It enhances their bargaining power against Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations (Cho et al. 2019).

Buyers are price insensitive, and cannot easily switch to other companies due to economic and psychological switching costs. It reduces their bargaining power against Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations.

High product differentiation further discourages the buyers from switching to competitors (Dobbs, 2014).

Overall, the bargaining power of buyers is moderate-to-low for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations.

2.2.3. Threat of new entrants

High entry barriers make it difficult for new entrants to enter in the market

The high initial capital expenditure also erects an entry barrier for new firms

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has a loyal customer base, which further reduces the risk of customers switching to new entrants (Grundy, 2006).

Overall, threat of new entrants for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations is low.

2.2.4. Threat of substitutes

The emerging innovative technologies are increasing the threat of substitutes for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

Growing threat of substitutes is compelling Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to continuously improve product quality (Bruijl and Gerard, 2018).

Changing consumer demographics and their growing tech-savvy nature is further increasing the substitute threat for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

However, the brand loyalty increases the psychological switching costs, which somehow reduces the substitute threat (Dobbs, 2014).

Overall, the substitute threat for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations is moderate to high.

2.2.5. Industry rivalry

The competition among existing market players is intense

The market is mature, and is approaching saturation point, which further intensifies the industry rivalry

However, high-quality differences and brand loyalty deters the customers from switching to competitors (Dobbs, 2014).

Overall, the industry rivalry is moderate to high, which makes the business environment challenging for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations.

3. Company level analysis of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

Up till now, the case study presented a holistic environmental and industry-level analysis. This section now presents the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations level analysis by applying relevant tools and frameworks.

3.1. SWOT of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

SWOT is a strategic management framework that helps Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations in understanding its core strengths and weaknesses. Framework also identifies opportunities and threats that reside in Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations’s external business environment (Helms and Nixon, 2010).

order_banner_here

3.1.1. Strengths

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations holds a market leadership position, and has highest market share.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has high customer loyalty, which makes it difficult for competitors to attract its customers.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has strong financial health, which allows the company to spend heavily on R&D, and fuel the innovation (Sarsby, 2016).

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has successfully positioned itself as a responsible corporate citizen.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has a wide supplier and distribution network, which helps in the business expansion (Valentin, 2001).

3.1.2. Weaknesses

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations currently has a high employee turnover rate.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations is facing supply chain inefficiencies, which are lowering the organizational productivity (Madsen, 2016).

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations is unable to quickly resolve the customer complaints, which causes customer dissatisfaction (Helms and Nixon, 2010).

The hierarchal structure of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations causes resistance to change.

3.1.3. Opportunities

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can invest on emerging automation and artificial intelligence technologies to improve the process efficiency

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can accelerate the green product development, and invest on green marketing efforts to capture the attention of environment-conscious customers (Solaiman et al. 2015).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can invest on an online influence marketing strategy to expand the reach to a young population

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can find strategic partners around the globe to achieve its expansion objectives (Sarsby, 2016).

3.1.4. Threats

The growing industry competition among existing players and thinning profit margins has become a major threat for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

Global political unrest can negatively affect the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations performance at the international stage

The expanding grey market and the influx of replica goods can negatively affect the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations revenue (Davidson et al. 2019).

Aging population can threaten the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations survival that, primarily focuses on young customers

After presenting the SWOT analysis, the next framework analyzing the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations’s marketing mix strategies.

3.2. Marketing mix of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

3.2.1. Product

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations offers a wide product variety that meets the needs of diverse customers

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has consistently maintained high product quality to justify premium prices

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations invests heavily on the quality improvement and management to meet the customers’ product quality expectations (Singh, 2012).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations invests on innovative marketing and communication strategies to set a clear product positioning, and communicate how its products are different from competitors.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations offers warranties and after-sale services that enhances the overall customer experience (Ferrell et al. 2021).

3.2.2. Price

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations adopts a premium pricing strategy, which is aligned with the company’s premium brand image.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations avoids offering price discounts to maintain brand exclusivity (Baines et al. 2017).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations does not charge any hidden prices, and has integrated transparency in its pricing model

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations also offers value-added elements, and adopts a bundle pricing strategy to boost the sales (Giri et al. 2020).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations offers credit payment options for the customer convenience.

Key factors that Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations considers while setting the prices include- brand image, customers’ expectations and purchase capacity, and on-going competition.

3.2.3. Place

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations adopts a selective distribution strategy to reach the target market

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations chooses distributors who are located in urban areas, and can preserve the premium brand image

Currently, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has a distribution network that is spread in more than 50 countries

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has adopted Omni-channel strategy, and sells its products through multiple online and offline channels, including- official outlets, authorized distributors, the company website and mobile application (Palmatier et al. 2016).

Well-integrated Omni-channel strategy offers a seamless experience to the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations customers.

3.2.4. Promotion

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations avoids offering promotional discounts to preserve the brand exclusivity.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations invests heavily on the celebrity endorsement strategies to promote the brand among the target market.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations also have a strong social media presence, and specifically focuses on the online influencer marketing strategy to create brand awareness (Varadarajan et al. 2010).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations uses both- online and offline marketing and communication channels to promote the brand.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations’s promotional strategy is well-aligned with other marketing mix components to develop a clear brand positioning (Palmatier et al. 2016).

3.3. VRIO of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

3.3.1. Valuable

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has a wide distribution network that is spread across the globe.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has extensive research and development capabilities that fuel the innovation process.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations offers a seamless customer experience through a well-integrated marketing mix.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has strong financial health, and free cash flow that it can invest on innovative projects.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has a strong presence over social media that drives the customer engagement, and increases the company’s reach to the target market.

The Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has successfully attracted and retained highly skilled staff that drives the overall organizational productivity, and helps the company in achieving its innovation objectives (Cardeal and Antonio, 2012).

3.3.2. Rare

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has built strong relationships with suppliers that enable the company to achieve production objectives even when there is a material shortage in the market

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has access to the rare and hard-to-reach raw material that is used to produce top-quality products (Cardeal and Antonio, 2012).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has successfully developed a strong brand reputation that keeps customers hooked with the brand

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations shares a strong emotional connection with its customers, which increases the psychological switching costs for them (Hernández and Garcia, 2018).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has developed its image as an environment-friendly, sustainable, and responsible brand that takes care of all stakeholders.

order_banner_here

3.3.3. Inimitable

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has developed an in-depth knowledge of customers’ intrinsic motivational needs, and has developed its brand image in a way that shares close relatedness with customers’ desired self-image (Liu et al. 2012).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has secured exclusive agreements with the suppliers to get access to unique raw materials. The exclusive agreement makes this resource inimitable for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has strong transformational and charismatic top leadership that has always successfully led the organization through a crisis (Nusari et al. 2018).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has developed a robust organizational culture that promotes cohesion, and strengthens the employees’ affective commitment with the organization.

3.3.4. Organized

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has secured the access to human capital (skills and expertise) that is needed to exploit the above-mentioned resources.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has a well-developed technical infrastructure that supports the business operations, and fuels the innovation process.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has built extensive expertise, and gained years of experience that helps the company in leveraging its core strengths to exploit the available opportunities.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has built strategic partnerships that help the company in pooling the resources together to gain a strong competitive edge over rivals (Cardeal and Antonio, 2012).

3.4. BCG of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

3.4.1. Stars

The core products of the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations fall in the star category. Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has secured market leadership in these categories

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations’s market share in these product categories is growing due to high market growth potential

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should pay specific attention to these product categories, and should try to preserve the market share

The intensifying competition imposes a threat to the Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations’s market leadership in the ‘Star’ category

Overall, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should increase investment on the star category to maintain leadership in the growing market (Mohajan, 2017).

3.4.2. Cash cows

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has several product categories in which the firm has attained the market leadership position.

However, the market growth in these product categories has become slowed with time, as the market has become mature.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should ‘milk’ these product categories as they are an important source of cash flow.

However, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should avoid increasing investment due to slowed market growth, and should bring innovation to keep adding new features.

Overall, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should aim to maintain the current market position, but avoid increasing the investment due to slow market growth (Kader and Hossain, 2020).

3.4.3. Question marks

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has some product categories that are in a growing market segment. Despite high market growth, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations is unable to increase the market share in these segments.

The products under this category have the potential to become stars, as they operate in a high-growth market.

But, extensive investment is needed to understand the reasons behind the low market share, and it can affect the cash flow of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations.

Therefore, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations needs to evaluate if it is feasible to increase the investment to drive the market share, or it is wise to divest from this market segment (Mohajan, 2017).

3.4.4. Dogs

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has one product that operates in a market with low growth potential

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations has only a marginal share in this market.

As growth in this market is stagnant, and market share is also marginal, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations may consider divesting from this market segment.

It will be unwise to invest in this segment, as this product has turned into ‘dog’, which means the product is aged and waning.

Here, two options are available to Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations:

o First, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations may entirely refresh the dying product.

o Alternatively, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations may divest this product from the portfolio.

Considering the current business environment, and competitive dynamics, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations is recommended to get rid of this product by taking divestment decisions (Torquati et al. 2018).

3.5. Ansoff matrix of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations aims to expand its business operations to strengthen the competitive positioning in the market. Ansoff matrix here can help Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations in taking the right business expansion decision.

Four business expansion strategies available to Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations are- market penetration, market expansion, product development, and diversification (Loredana, 2016).

Choosing the right expansion strategy is important for Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to achieve its expansion objectives.

3.5.1. Market penetration

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can penetrate into existing markets by expanding the market reach. This strategy is recommended when the market has high growth potential.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can expand the market reach by increasing the customer loyalty, and encouraging them to increase the spending.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can use the influencer marketing strategy as a tool to create e-WOM. It will create brand awareness, spread the brand message, and enable Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to penetrate deeper into the market.

Some other ways through which Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can penetrate into the market is- to increase the marketing and promotional budget, making price adjustments, and improving the product quality to gain a larger share from the existing market (Shaw, 2012).

3.5.2. Market development

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can find new geographic markets to launch its existing products

Another way to pursue this expansion strategy is through celebrity endorsements. Celebrities can help Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations in finding new customers for existing products

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can also consider adding new product dimensions, or revising the packaging to reach new consumer markets.

Another way to pursue this expansion strategy is by exploring new distribution channels. Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can strengthen its presence on e-commerce, and open multiple online sales channels to reach new customer markets (Hussain et al. 2013).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can also charge two different prices to expand the reach from high-end to middle-class customers.

3.5.3. Product development

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can expand its business operations by pursuing a product development strategy.

Instead of adopting a reactive attitude by coping with the competitors, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations must proactively behave while launching new products. Some possible proactive product development strategies are discussed below.

To pursue a proactive product development strategy, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations may increase investment on research and development activities to bring the product innovation.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations may also invest on the market research to identify and respond to the unmet customer needs (Katsikeas et al. 2016).

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations may consider strategic alliance and partnership options to launch new products. It will enable the company to pool the resources and capabilities together, and share risks while launching new products.

Acquisition of smaller firms can also enable Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to successfully launch new products in the comparatively shorter time span.

3.5.4. Diversification

order_banner_here

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can adopt the diversification strategy to reach new markets through new products.

Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can pursue either a related or unrelated diversification strategy.

The related diversification strategy requires Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to enter in similar markets. But, unrelated diversification requires Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to find entirely new markets (Dhir and Dhir, 2015).

Unrelated diversification is riskier, and can affect the brand image. So, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations should pursue a related diversification strategy.

By pursuing related diversification, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can horizontally and vertically add new product lines

Through successful diversification, Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations can increase its profitability, and generate more revenue from the new products and new market segments (Loredana, 2016).

4. Conclusion

The in-depth strategic analysis of Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations reveals some interesting insights. Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations currently holds strong competitive positioning. However, the challenging business environment and intensifying competition require Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations to adopt a proactive behavior. Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations needs to continuously assess its external and internal business environment to timely identify the potential threats and opportunities. Here, the application of relevant strategic management tools and frameworks can help Myth or Reality The Dynamics of the Contemporary Learning Organizations in making wise business decisions. The key to success in a such challenging and complex business environment is- to proactively respond to the external environment by leveraging core strengths, and overcoming the weaknesses.

order_banner_here

5. References

  • Baines, P., Fill, C. and Rosengren, S., 2017.Marketing. Oxford University Press.
  • Begley, T.M., Tan, W.L. and Schoch, H., 2005. Politico–economic factors associated with interest in starting a business: A multi–country study.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,29(1), pp.35-55.
  • Bruijl, D. and Gerard, H.T., 2018. The relevance of Porter's five forces in today's innovative and changing business environment.Available at SSRN 3192207.
  • Cardeal, N. and Antonio, N.S., 2012. Valuable, rare, inimitable resources and organization (VRIO) resources or valuable, rare, inimitable resources (VRI) capabilities: What leads to competitive advantage?.Cardeal, N., António, (2012), pp.10159-10170.
  • Cho, W., Ke, J.Y.F. and Han, C., 2019. An empirical examination of the use of bargaining power and its impacts on supply chain financial performance.Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,25(4), p.100550.
  • Davidson, A., Nepomuceno, M.V. and Laroche, M., 2019. Shame on you: when materialism leads to purchase intentions toward counterfeit products.Journal of Business Ethics,155, pp.479-494.
  • Dhir, S. and Dhir, S., 2015. Diversification: Literature review and issues.Strategic Change,24(6), pp.569-588.
  • Dobbs, M.E., 2014. Guidelines for applying Porter's five forces framework: a set of industry analysis templates.Competitiveness review,24(1), pp.32-45.
  • Ferrell, O.C., Hartline, M. and Hochstein, B.W., 2021.Marketing strategy. Cengage Learning.
  • Giri, R.N., Mondal, S.K. and Maiti, M., 2020. Bundle pricing strategies for two complementary products with different channel powers.Annals of Operations Research,287, pp.701-725.
  • Grundy, T., 2006. Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter's five forces model.Strategic change,15(5), pp.213-229.
  • Hamilton, L. and Webster, P., 2018.The international business environment. Oxford University Press.
  • Helms, M.M. and Nixon, J., 2010. Exploring SWOT analysis–where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade.Journal of strategy and management,3(3), pp.215-251.
  • Hernández, J.G.V. and Garcia, F.C., 2018. The link between a firm s internal characteristics and performance: GPTW & VRIO dimension analysis.Revista de Administração IMED,8(2), pp.222-235.
  • Hussain, S., Khattak, J., Rizwan, A. and Latif, M.A., 2013. ANSOFF matrix, environment, and growth-an interactive triangle.Management and Administrative Sciences Review,2(2), pp.196-206.
  • Kader, M.A. and Hossain, H., 2020. An analysis on BCG growth sharing matrix.International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR),4(01).
  • Katsikeas, C.S., Leonidou, C.N. and Zeriti, A., 2016. Eco-friendly product development strategy: antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,44, pp.660-684.
  • Khalid, L.S. and Rahman, I.A., 2019. Conceptual model for the external factors affecting project performance using PESTLE factors.Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems,11(3), pp.246-250.
  • Liu, F., Li, J., Mizerski, D. and Soh, H., 2012. Self‐congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: a study on luxury brands.European Journal of Marketing.
  • Loredana, E.M., 2016. The use of Ansoff matrix in the field of business. InMATEC Web of Conferences(Vol. 44, p. 01006).
  • Madsen, D.Ø., 2016. SWOT analysis: a management fashion perspective.International Journal of Business Research,16(1), pp.39-56.
  • Mohajan, H., 2017. An analysis on BCG growth sharing matrix.
  • Moser, A.K., 2015. Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior.Journal of consumer marketing.
  • Nusari, M., Al Falasi, M., Ghosh, A. and Isaac, O., 2018. Impact of transformational leadership on project management assets.International Journal of Management and Human Science (IJMHS),2(4), pp.38-51.
  • Palmatier, R.W., Stern, L.W. and El-Ansary, A.I., 2016.Marketing channel strategy: An omni-channel approach. Routledge.
  • Perera, R., 2017.The PESTLE analysis. Nerdynaut.
  • Sarsby, A., 2016.SWOT analysis. Lulu. com.
  • Shaw, E.H., 2012. Marketing strategy: From the origin of the concept to the development of a conceptual framework.Journal of Historical Research in Marketing.
  • Shtal, T.V., Buriak, M., Ukubassova, G., Amirbekuly, Y., Toiboldinova, Z. and Tlegen, T., 2018. Methods of analysis of the external environment of business activities.
  • Singh, M., 2012. Marketing mix of 4P’s for competitive advantage.IOSR Journal of Business and Management,3(6), pp.40-45.
  • Solaiman, M., Osman, A. and Halim, M.S.B.A., 2015. Green marketing: A marketing mix point of view.
  • Torquati, B., Scarpa, R., Petrosillo, I., Ligonzo, M.G. and Paffarini, C., 2018. How can consumer science help firms transform their dog (BCG Matrix) products into profitable products?. InCase Studies in the Traditional Food Sector(pp. 255-279). Woodhead Publishing.
  • Valentin, E.K., 2001. SWOT analysis from a resource-based view.Journal of marketing theory and practice,9(2), pp.54-69.
  • Varadarajan, R., 2010. Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,38, pp.119-140.
graduate

9416 Students

can’t be Wrong

556+

PhD Experts

20K+

Orders in 2022

4.9/5.0

Rating

10

Years in market

Latest Feedback

The writer was professional and divinely communicated with me. Even I asked them some further questions that were not part of the defined work. He answered me quickly and I got freedom from confusing issues.

5.0 / 5.0

reviewstarts

If someone is too dreadful with plagiarism. No worries! This service has the solution to your problem on the ground that it provides the report that describes the genuineness of the assignment.

5.0 / 5.0

reviewstarts

This service is as right as it speaks. As I always love its discounts, I want to cherish them again but with a slight demand. Kindly give me more discounts on being a regular customer. Thanks!

5.0 / 5.0

reviewstarts

The writer was conscientious regarding the project and I obtained what his service promised to me and what I paid for.

5.0 / 5.0

reviewstarts

calculator Calculate Order Price

Total Price

$0

Interpretation of Terms:

  • Only original papers
  • Plagiarism Free Report
  • 100% Confidential
  • Free Revisions
  • Affordable Prices
  • Free Credit
  • 24/7 support
  • Confidentiality
Order Now!

Price includes

  • Originality Report $12.36 Free
  • Unlimited Edits $12.36 Free
  • Formatting $12.36 Free
  • Title Page $12.36 Free
  • Outline $12.36 Free
  • The Best Writer $12.36 Free

  • Get all these features for $74.16 Free
Order Now!

Top Writers and Tutors ready to help you Round the Clock!

96% of our customers say they get better grades when they hire our professional help in personalized learning and essays.

Get Help

Never Hired a Professional Online?

A recent surveys suggests that at least 76% students acquire professional help online. So, give it your first try. We promise not to disappoint you at all.

uparrow
whatsapp chatbox

Hi there !

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

whatsapp chat close