Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes Case Solution

1. Introduction

This case study presents a detailed strategic analysis of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes. The case analysis covers key managerial and strategic issues that Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes is currently facing due to challenging internal and external environments. The case solution first conducts the strategic analysis by applying the relevant strategic management tools and frameworks, and then presents strategic recommendations based on overall analysis (Hamilton and Webster, 2018).

The case offers a holistic view of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes business environment. Case findings are relevant for all key stakeholders of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes. Reader should first read the case on Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes, and then read the analysis.

2. External environmental analysis of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

The external business environment comprises political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental factors that influence the strategic positioning of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes (Khalid and Rahman, 2019).

Here are key external environment characteristics:

External environmental forces are dynamic and uncontrollable

External environment can directly influence the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes strategic positioning

External environment requires continuous monitoring to timely identify the potential threats and opportunities (Shtal et al. 2018).

2.1. PESTLE analysis of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

2.1.1. Political

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes must carefully examine the potential impact of global political unrest on its business operations

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should actively monitor, and respond to the changes to legislation

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should analyze how taxation policies can influence its profitability in different countries where the company is currently present (Khalid and Rahman, 2019).

2.1.2. Economic

Rising GDP and growing consumer spending can help Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes in business expansion

Increasing interest rates can increase the debt cost for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes.

Reducing inflation can decrease the production cost of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes and increase profitability by driving up the sales revenue (Begley et al. 2005).

2.1.3. Social

The aging population can affect the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes brand positioning, as Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes currently targets young people.

Growing preferences for luxury items, and improving lifestyles can create more demand for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes premium-priced products (Perera, 2017).

2.1.4. Technological

Government is granting more technology incentives to fuel the innovation. It can help Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes achieve its innovation objectives.

Emerging automation trends require Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to revisit its business model, and enhance process efficiency.

Improving technological infrastructure can enable Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to resolve its supply chain inefficiencies (Shtal et al. 2018).

2.1.5. Environmental

The stringent environmental regulations require Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to ensure strict compliance with environmental standards.

Consumers’ growing environmental consciousness provides an opportunity to Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to launch more green, environment-friendly products.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should incorporate environmental thinking in its strategic decision-making process to position itself as a socially responsible organization (Moser, 2015).

2.1.6. Legal

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should take strict measures to avoid discrimination at the workplace.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes must abide by the consumer data privacy laws to avoid reputation-damaging lawsuits

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes must also ensure strict implementation of workplace safety standards to comply with the health and safety regulations (Khalid and Rahman, 2019).

2.2. Porter five forces of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

2.2.1. Bargaining power of suppliers

The growing number of suppliers is weakening their bargaining power against Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes (Dobbs, 2014).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has a wide supplier network, which strengthens its negotiation ability.

Low product differentiation further reduces the supplier bargaining power, as Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can easily switch to suppliers that offer better terms and conditions (Dobbs, 2014).

Overall, the bargaining power of suppliers for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes is low.

2.2.2. Bargaining power of buyers

There are a small number of buyers that buy in large quantities. It enhances their bargaining power against Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes (Cho et al. 2019).

Buyers are price insensitive, and cannot easily switch to other companies due to economic and psychological switching costs. It reduces their bargaining power against Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes.

High product differentiation further discourages the buyers from switching to competitors (Dobbs, 2014).

Overall, the bargaining power of buyers is moderate-to-low for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes.

2.2.3. Threat of new entrants

High entry barriers make it difficult for new entrants to enter in the market

The high initial capital expenditure also erects an entry barrier for new firms

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has a loyal customer base, which further reduces the risk of customers switching to new entrants (Grundy, 2006).

Overall, threat of new entrants for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes is low.

2.2.4. Threat of substitutes

The emerging innovative technologies are increasing the threat of substitutes for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

Growing threat of substitutes is compelling Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to continuously improve product quality (Bruijl and Gerard, 2018).

Changing consumer demographics and their growing tech-savvy nature is further increasing the substitute threat for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

However, the brand loyalty increases the psychological switching costs, which somehow reduces the substitute threat (Dobbs, 2014).

Overall, the substitute threat for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes is moderate to high.

2.2.5. Industry rivalry

The competition among existing market players is intense

The market is mature, and is approaching saturation point, which further intensifies the industry rivalry

However, high-quality differences and brand loyalty deters the customers from switching to competitors (Dobbs, 2014).

Overall, the industry rivalry is moderate to high, which makes the business environment challenging for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes.

3. Company level analysis of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

Up till now, the case study presented a holistic environmental and industry-level analysis. This section now presents the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes level analysis by applying relevant tools and frameworks.

3.1. SWOT of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

SWOT is a strategic management framework that helps Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes in understanding its core strengths and weaknesses. Framework also identifies opportunities and threats that reside in Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes’s external business environment (Helms and Nixon, 2010).

3.1.1. Strengths

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes holds a market leadership position, and has highest market share.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has high customer loyalty, which makes it difficult for competitors to attract its customers.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has strong financial health, which allows the company to spend heavily on R&D, and fuel the innovation (Sarsby, 2016).

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has successfully positioned itself as a responsible corporate citizen.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has a wide supplier and distribution network, which helps in the business expansion (Valentin, 2001).

3.1.2. Weaknesses

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes currently has a high employee turnover rate.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes is facing supply chain inefficiencies, which are lowering the organizational productivity (Madsen, 2016).

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes is unable to quickly resolve the customer complaints, which causes customer dissatisfaction (Helms and Nixon, 2010).

The hierarchal structure of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes causes resistance to change.

3.1.3. Opportunities

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can invest on emerging automation and artificial intelligence technologies to improve the process efficiency

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can accelerate the green product development, and invest on green marketing efforts to capture the attention of environment-conscious customers (Solaiman et al. 2015).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can invest on an online influence marketing strategy to expand the reach to a young population

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can find strategic partners around the globe to achieve its expansion objectives (Sarsby, 2016).

3.1.4. Threats

The growing industry competition among existing players and thinning profit margins has become a major threat for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

Global political unrest can negatively affect the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes performance at the international stage

The expanding grey market and the influx of replica goods can negatively affect the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes revenue (Davidson et al. 2019).

Aging population can threaten the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes survival that, primarily focuses on young customers

After presenting the SWOT analysis, the next framework analyzing the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes’s marketing mix strategies.

3.2. Marketing mix of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

3.2.1. Product

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes offers a wide product variety that meets the needs of diverse customers

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has consistently maintained high product quality to justify premium prices

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes invests heavily on the quality improvement and management to meet the customers’ product quality expectations (Singh, 2012).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes invests on innovative marketing and communication strategies to set a clear product positioning, and communicate how its products are different from competitors.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes offers warranties and after-sale services that enhances the overall customer experience (Ferrell et al. 2021).

3.2.2. Price

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes adopts a premium pricing strategy, which is aligned with the company’s premium brand image.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes avoids offering price discounts to maintain brand exclusivity (Baines et al. 2017).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes does not charge any hidden prices, and has integrated transparency in its pricing model

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes also offers value-added elements, and adopts a bundle pricing strategy to boost the sales (Giri et al. 2020).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes offers credit payment options for the customer convenience.

Key factors that Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes considers while setting the prices include- brand image, customers’ expectations and purchase capacity, and on-going competition.

3.2.3. Place

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes adopts a selective distribution strategy to reach the target market

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes chooses distributors who are located in urban areas, and can preserve the premium brand image

Currently, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has a distribution network that is spread in more than 50 countries

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has adopted Omni-channel strategy, and sells its products through multiple online and offline channels, including- official outlets, authorized distributors, the company website and mobile application (Palmatier et al. 2016).

Well-integrated Omni-channel strategy offers a seamless experience to the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes customers.

3.2.4. Promotion

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes avoids offering promotional discounts to preserve the brand exclusivity.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes invests heavily on the celebrity endorsement strategies to promote the brand among the target market.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes also have a strong social media presence, and specifically focuses on the online influencer marketing strategy to create brand awareness (Varadarajan et al. 2010).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes uses both- online and offline marketing and communication channels to promote the brand.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes’s promotional strategy is well-aligned with other marketing mix components to develop a clear brand positioning (Palmatier et al. 2016).

3.3. VRIO of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

3.3.1. Valuable

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has a wide distribution network that is spread across the globe.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has extensive research and development capabilities that fuel the innovation process.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes offers a seamless customer experience through a well-integrated marketing mix.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has strong financial health, and free cash flow that it can invest on innovative projects.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has a strong presence over social media that drives the customer engagement, and increases the company’s reach to the target market.

The Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has successfully attracted and retained highly skilled staff that drives the overall organizational productivity, and helps the company in achieving its innovation objectives (Cardeal and Antonio, 2012).

3.3.2. Rare

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has built strong relationships with suppliers that enable the company to achieve production objectives even when there is a material shortage in the market

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has access to the rare and hard-to-reach raw material that is used to produce top-quality products (Cardeal and Antonio, 2012).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has successfully developed a strong brand reputation that keeps customers hooked with the brand

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes shares a strong emotional connection with its customers, which increases the psychological switching costs for them (Hernández and Garcia, 2018).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has developed its image as an environment-friendly, sustainable, and responsible brand that takes care of all stakeholders.

3.3.3. Inimitable

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has developed an in-depth knowledge of customers’ intrinsic motivational needs, and has developed its brand image in a way that shares close relatedness with customers’ desired self-image (Liu et al. 2012).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has secured exclusive agreements with the suppliers to get access to unique raw materials. The exclusive agreement makes this resource inimitable for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has strong transformational and charismatic top leadership that has always successfully led the organization through a crisis (Nusari et al. 2018).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has developed a robust organizational culture that promotes cohesion, and strengthens the employees’ affective commitment with the organization.

3.3.4. Organized

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has secured the access to human capital (skills and expertise) that is needed to exploit the above-mentioned resources.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has a well-developed technical infrastructure that supports the business operations, and fuels the innovation process.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has built extensive expertise, and gained years of experience that helps the company in leveraging its core strengths to exploit the available opportunities.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has built strategic partnerships that help the company in pooling the resources together to gain a strong competitive edge over rivals (Cardeal and Antonio, 2012).

3.4. BCG of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

3.4.1. Stars

The core products of the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes fall in the star category. Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has secured market leadership in these categories

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes’s market share in these product categories is growing due to high market growth potential

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should pay specific attention to these product categories, and should try to preserve the market share

The intensifying competition imposes a threat to the Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes’s market leadership in the ‘Star’ category

Overall, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should increase investment on the star category to maintain leadership in the growing market (Mohajan, 2017).

3.4.2. Cash cows

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has several product categories in which the firm has attained the market leadership position.

However, the market growth in these product categories has become slowed with time, as the market has become mature.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should ‘milk’ these product categories as they are an important source of cash flow.

However, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should avoid increasing investment due to slowed market growth, and should bring innovation to keep adding new features.

Overall, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should aim to maintain the current market position, but avoid increasing the investment due to slow market growth (Kader and Hossain, 2020).

3.4.3. Question marks

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has some product categories that are in a growing market segment. Despite high market growth, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes is unable to increase the market share in these segments.

The products under this category have the potential to become stars, as they operate in a high-growth market.

But, extensive investment is needed to understand the reasons behind the low market share, and it can affect the cash flow of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes.

Therefore, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes needs to evaluate if it is feasible to increase the investment to drive the market share, or it is wise to divest from this market segment (Mohajan, 2017).

3.4.4. Dogs

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has one product that operates in a market with low growth potential

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes has only a marginal share in this market.

As growth in this market is stagnant, and market share is also marginal, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes may consider divesting from this market segment.

It will be unwise to invest in this segment, as this product has turned into ‘dog’, which means the product is aged and waning.

Here, two options are available to Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes:

o First, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes may entirely refresh the dying product.

o Alternatively, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes may divest this product from the portfolio.

Considering the current business environment, and competitive dynamics, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes is recommended to get rid of this product by taking divestment decisions (Torquati et al. 2018).

3.5. Ansoff matrix of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes aims to expand its business operations to strengthen the competitive positioning in the market. Ansoff matrix here can help Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes in taking the right business expansion decision.

Four business expansion strategies available to Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes are- market penetration, market expansion, product development, and diversification (Loredana, 2016).

Choosing the right expansion strategy is important for Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to achieve its expansion objectives.

3.5.1. Market penetration

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can penetrate into existing markets by expanding the market reach. This strategy is recommended when the market has high growth potential.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can expand the market reach by increasing the customer loyalty, and encouraging them to increase the spending.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can use the influencer marketing strategy as a tool to create e-WOM. It will create brand awareness, spread the brand message, and enable Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to penetrate deeper into the market.

Some other ways through which Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can penetrate into the market is- to increase the marketing and promotional budget, making price adjustments, and improving the product quality to gain a larger share from the existing market (Shaw, 2012).

3.5.2. Market development

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can find new geographic markets to launch its existing products

Another way to pursue this expansion strategy is through celebrity endorsements. Celebrities can help Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes in finding new customers for existing products

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can also consider adding new product dimensions, or revising the packaging to reach new consumer markets.

Another way to pursue this expansion strategy is by exploring new distribution channels. Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can strengthen its presence on e-commerce, and open multiple online sales channels to reach new customer markets (Hussain et al. 2013).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can also charge two different prices to expand the reach from high-end to middle-class customers.

3.5.3. Product development

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can expand its business operations by pursuing a product development strategy.

Instead of adopting a reactive attitude by coping with the competitors, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes must proactively behave while launching new products. Some possible proactive product development strategies are discussed below.

To pursue a proactive product development strategy, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes may increase investment on research and development activities to bring the product innovation.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes may also invest on the market research to identify and respond to the unmet customer needs (Katsikeas et al. 2016).

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes may consider strategic alliance and partnership options to launch new products. It will enable the company to pool the resources and capabilities together, and share risks while launching new products.

Acquisition of smaller firms can also enable Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to successfully launch new products in the comparatively shorter time span.

3.5.4. Diversification

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can adopt the diversification strategy to reach new markets through new products.

Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can pursue either a related or unrelated diversification strategy.

The related diversification strategy requires Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to enter in similar markets. But, unrelated diversification requires Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to find entirely new markets (Dhir and Dhir, 2015).

Unrelated diversification is riskier, and can affect the brand image. So, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes should pursue a related diversification strategy.

By pursuing related diversification, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can horizontally and vertically add new product lines

Through successful diversification, Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes can increase its profitability, and generate more revenue from the new products and new market segments (Loredana, 2016).

4. Conclusion

The in-depth strategic analysis of Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes reveals some interesting insights. Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes currently holds strong competitive positioning. However, the challenging business environment and intensifying competition require Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes to adopt a proactive behavior. Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes needs to continuously assess its external and internal business environment to timely identify the potential threats and opportunities. Here, the application of relevant strategic management tools and frameworks can help Income Smoothing Management Consequences and Auditor Responsibilites in the Case of Beazer Homes in making wise business decisions. The key to success in a such challenging and complex business environment is- to proactively respond to the external environment by leveraging core strengths, and overcoming the weaknesses.